Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 29, 1977 <br />he drove by the house last Friday and the windows were boarded <br />and the landscaping not complete,,, The Board reviewed photographs <br />of the house and noted that some windows are still boarded and <br />there is no evidence of a lawn. Mr. Brunner asked Mr. Newton <br />if Mr. Locker was given an extension of time beyond the July 9 <br />date set by the Hearing Officer. Mr. Newton said he was not because <br />most of the repairs were completed. Mr. Brunner asked why the <br />front windows were still boarded. Mr. Newton said he understood it <br />was because some windows have been broken out since the house was <br />moved onto the site. Mr. Brunner asked what action could be taken <br />now if Mr. Locker is not in compliance with the order. Mr. Newton <br />said he could send a contractor out to complete the painting and <br />take the boards down but it might be difficult to get a contractor to <br />take on such a job. Mr. Brunner said it would appear that there <br />was work done in the last two weeks that should have been done two <br />years ago and questioned why Mr. Locker stopped short of unboarding <br />the windows. Mr. Locker said he had an agreement with Mr. Newton <br />that the windows could remain boarded until the house is sold. He <br />said he has not completed the interior painting because he has two <br />prospective buyers and they want to buy the house as it is and complete <br />the work. He said he has been unable to find a craftsman to complete <br />the stone work. Mr. Mullen asked Mr. Locker if he had two persons <br />interested in the property at this time. Mr. Locker said he had received <br />two inquiries. One individual attempted to get financing for the <br />purchase but was not successful. Mr. Locker said he could remove the <br />boards if the Board feels this would make the house more presentable. <br />Mr. Brunner said boarded windows are symbolic of a sub -standard house <br />in the minds of many people and he would request that the boards be <br />removed as soon as possible. Mr. Locker asked what protection the <br />City would provide if he removes the boards from the windows. Mr. <br />Brunner said he would assume the breaking of the windows was a chance <br />occurrence and would not happen again. Mr. McMahon said the lawn is <br />clay and he would like to see some ground cover. Mr. Locker said <br />he attempted to put a lawn in in July but the hot weather prevented it.. <br />Mr. McMahon noted that Mr. Locker has had sufficient time to put in <br />a lawn in the time the house has been on the lot. Mr. Brunner asked <br />Mr. Newton to follow through on this matter and Mr. Newton said he <br />could set a time of one week for Mr. Locker to comply. Mr. Mullen <br />said Mr. Locker has had additional time since the July 9th deadline <br />and has not completed the work. He said action should have been <br />taken on July 10. Mr. Newton said he was advised by one of his <br />inspectors that the work was done so he took no action at that time. <br />Mr. Mullen said the repairs required by the Hearing Officer have not <br />been made and the City has been extremely generous in allowing Mr. <br />Locker additional time. He noted there are four actions which can <br />be taken for non-compliance with the order of the Hearing Officer and <br />he suggested that one of these actions be pursued. Mr. McMahon said, <br />if this house were in his neighborhood, he would take every action <br />possible to get the owner to comply. Mr..Brunner agreed and said no <br />apparent action was taken for over a year and a half and he'.would <br />like to see the situation remedied and the boarding down. Mr. McMahon <br />made a motion that the Board direct the Legal Department to determine <br />whether action can be taken against Mr. Locker for failure to comply <br />with the order of the Hearing Officer to have the property brought <br />up to Code standards by July 9, 1977. Mr. Mullen seconded the <br />motion and it carried. Mr. Brunner requested that Mr. Newton contact <br />Deputy City Attorney Sanford Brook today in regard to any immediate <br />action which can be taken to remove the boarding and complete the work. <br />BID AWARDED - WESTERN AVENUE OFF-STREET PARKING PROJECT <br />John E. Leszczynski, Manager of the Bureau of Public Construction, <br />submitted to the Board a bid tabulation or bids received for the <br />Western Avenue Off -Street Parking Project and his recommendation that <br />the low bid of Walsh & Kelly of $41,692.15 including Alternate A <br />be accepted. Upon motion made by Mr. McMahon, seconded by Mr. Mullen <br />and carried, the recommendation to award the bid to Walsh & Kelly, Inc. <br />on their low bid was accepted. <br />