Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JUNE 27, 1977 <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Public Works was convened at <br />9:30 a.m. on Monday, June 27, 1977 by President Patrick McMahon, <br />with Mr. McMahon, Mr. Brunner and Mr. Mullen present. Deputy City <br />Attorney Terry A. Crone was also present. <br />MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS APPROVED <br />Mr. McMahon reported that he had reviewed the minutes of the <br />June 20 meeting of the Board and he made a motion that the minutes <br />be approved as submitted. Mr -Mullen seconded the motion and it <br />carried. Mr.. McMahon noted that the Board held a special meeting <br />on June 21, 1977 to act on requests for a Sidewalk Sale, Street <br />Services and a Fireworks. Stand and these, minutes have also been <br />reviewed. He made a motion that the minutes of the special meeting <br />be approved. Mr. Mullen seconded the motion and it carried. <br />MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE APPROVED CONDITIONALLY <br />This was the date set for holding a public hearing on an application <br />to operate a massage establishment at 914 N. Olive. James�McCay <br />submitted a properly executed application to operate the establishment <br />at Dave's Gym. The Building Department and the Police Department <br />reviewed the application, in accordance with the ordinance and <br />recommended approval. The Fire Department made an inspection of <br />the building and recommended the ina.tallat on of illuminated <br />exit lights at front and rear exit doors, more fire extinguishers <br />and removal of a pop maczine from an exit door at the west exit. <br />The reports were filed. Upon motion made by Mr. McMahon, seconded by <br />Mr. Brunner and carried, the application was approved, subject to <br />compliance with the requirements of the Fire Inspection Bureau. <br />Mr. McCay's application for a license as a Massage Technician was <br />referred to the City Controller for processing. <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL -VACATION RESOLUTION NO. 3441 <br />This being the date set hearing was held on the Assessment Roll for <br />Vacation Resolution No. 3441 for the vacation of the east -west <br />alley between South Street and Bronson Street from the east right- <br />of-way line of Michigan Street east to the west right-of-way line <br />of the north -south alley; also fr..om the east right-of-way line of <br />the north -south alley east to the west right-of-way line of St. <br />Joseph Street. The Clerk tendered proofs of publication of notice <br />in the South Bend Tribune and the Tri-County News which were found <br />to be sufficient. No remonstrators appeared and no written remon- <br />strances were filed. Upon motion made by Mr. McMahon, seconded by <br />Mr. Brunner and carried, the Assessment Roll showing $0.00 net <br />damages and $0.00 net benefits was approved and said resolution is <br />in all things ratified and confirmed and said proceedings closed. <br />LETTER FROM MICHIANA INDEPENDENT AUTOMOBILE DEALERS FILED <br />The Board received a letter from the Michiana Independent Automobile <br />Dealers Association, signed by John Magrames, President, express- <br />ing their concern about the leasing of the Colfax Parking Garage <br />by Sunday Auto Mart. The Association noted that it is their opinion <br />that the law in the State of Indiana prohibits the sale of a motor <br />vehicle on Sunday. They q_ues tioned itfie matter of liability from <br />accident or injury -the fact that an individual might become involved <br />in expensive repairs, reinspection.costs or small claims court action <br />if an individual attempted to back out of a deal. The Association <br />requested that the Board rescind their action permitting use of the <br />parking garage for this activity. Mr. McMahon noted that the Legal <br />Department had reviewed the contract with Sunday Auto Tart. Deputy <br />City Attorney Terry Crone reported that Indiana state law prohibits <br />a dealer from selling autos on Sunday. Sunday Auto Mart does not <br />meet the statutory definition of a dealer and would not be in violation <br />of the statute. Mr. Hedman and Mr. Woodruff of Sunday Auto Mart were <br />