Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 1. Internal Control: A Brief Timeline <br />controls was clear; the challenge, <br />however, was the introduction and <br />implementation of new controls in a <br />small but very busy office, in which <br />most employees were <br />unfamiliar with , <br />control concepts. =z <br />Training began <br />at monthly staff <br />meetings, with <br />internal control <br />topics introduced <br />in small segments. <br />Initially, training <br />focused on the defi- <br />nition of internal <br />control as stated in <br />the Uniform Internal <br />Control Standards <br />for Indiana Political <br />Subdivisions, a docu- <br />ment prepared by <br />the SBOA following <br />adoption of the <br />2015 state law. The <br />SBOA's standards <br />emphasize the role — that employees play <br />in controls: "Ultimately, it is the <br />people at every level of the orga- <br />nization that are instrumental in <br />ensuring the success of the internal <br />control process. Accordingly, internal <br />controls integrate the attitudes and <br />actions of people within the orga- <br />nization into the processes .112 The <br />county auditor's office emphasized <br />that even though management has <br />profound responsibilities in internal <br />control, staff involvement is crucial. <br />By emphasizing that internal control <br />is not a set of rigid <br />rules but a process <br />that needs a buy -in <br />from staff to make <br />it work, employees <br />were given owner- <br />ship of this impor- <br />tant endeavor. It <br />makes little sense <br />for management to <br />adopt policies that <br />staff find unwork- <br />able. Employees <br />need to know that <br />their input is valu- <br />able and that for <br />controls to be effec- <br />tive, "we are all in <br />this together." <br />Early training <br />efforts in the county <br />- - - auditor's office also <br />introduced staff to <br />key developments in the regulatory <br />history of controls, as illustrated in <br />Figure 1. Staff discussions explored <br />the accounting scandals that led <br />to the Sarbanes -Oxley Act and the <br />internal control audit requirements <br />that resulted. By tying events that <br />had national significance to their <br />It makes little <br />sense for management <br />to adopt policies that <br />staff find unworkable. <br />Employees need to <br />know that their input <br />is valuable and that for <br />controls to be effective. <br />we are all <br />in this together! <br />daily workplace, the local auditor <br />staff gained a deeper understanding <br />of the need for, and benefits of, <br />internal control. Employees were <br />also introduced to the GAO's "Green <br />Book;' including the GAO's efforts <br />to make the federal standards appli- <br />cable to state and local governments .3 <br />While internal control concepts <br />were presented to the auditor staff <br />in a concise, summary manner, the <br />topic wasn't dumbed down, either. <br />Employees were treated as profes- <br />sionals who were expected to help <br />make a significant contribution <br />toward the effective and efficient <br />operation of their office. <br />Implementation Challenges <br />Getting employees to understand <br />what internal control is, -and what it <br />isn't, is one matter. Actually imple- <br />menting controls is another. To intro- <br />duce the five control - components, <br />employees in-the- county- and -itor <br />office learned -about the- control <br />cube, as pictured in Figure -2, which <br />gives a visual representation of how <br />the components interrelate with <br />each other, with the entity's orga- <br />nizational structure, and with the <br />reporting, compliance and opera- <br />tions objectives. Discussion topics <br />included an analysis of how most of <br />us implement controls in our daily <br />22 JOURNAL OF GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FALL 2016 <br />