My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/16/82 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
08/16/82 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 2:36:22 PM
Creation date
11/2/2016 3:38:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
8/16/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3'78 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />AUGUST 16, 1982 <br />The regular meeting of the Board of Public Works was convened at <br />9:30 a.m., on Monday, August 16, 1982, by President John E. <br />Leszczynski, with Mr. Leszczynski, Mr. Richard L. Hill and Mr. <br />Joseph E. Kernan present. Also present was Assistant City <br />Attorney Carolyn Pfotenhauer. <br />MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING APPROVED <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Kernan, seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, <br />the minutes of the August 9, 1982, regular meeting of the Board <br />were approved as submitted. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - APPROVE VACATION OF ALL ALLEYS BOUNDED BY BRONSON, <br />COLUMBIA, CONRAIL VIADUCT AND CARROLL (MONROE-SAMPLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA) <br />Mr. Leszczynski advised that the Redevelopment Commission was petition- <br />ing for the vacation of all north -south and east -west alleys in the <br />block bounded by Bronson, Columbia, the Conrail Viaduct and Carroll <br />Streets in the Monroe -Sample Redevelopment Area. He stated that, <br />as in the past, in order for the Board to submit a recommendation <br />to the Common Council, a public hearing had been scheduled at this <br />time and all property owners within 200 feet of the alleys had <br />been duly notified. He further advised that favorable comments <br />in support of the vacation had been received from the Engineering <br />Department, Area Plan Commission and Community Development Depart- <br />ment. Mr. Kevin Horton, Deputy Director for the Department of <br />Redevelopment, asked for a favorable recommendation from the <br />Board for the alley vacations. There was no one present to <br />speak against the alley vacations. Upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Kernan, seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, the public hearing was <br />closed and a favorable recommendation for the vacation of the <br />above alleys was forwarded to the Common Council, subject to the <br />maintenance of all utility easements. <br />AWARD BID AND APPROVE CONTRACT - CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIRS <br />(ZIOLKOWSKI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) <br />Mr. Leszczynski advised that, in accordance with the bids received <br />by the Board on August 9, 1982, for the Concrete Pavement Repair <br />Project, Mr. Neil Shanahan, Manager of the Bureau of Public <br />Construction, was recommending the Board award the low bid of <br />Ziolkowski Construction Company in the amount of $217,589.90. <br />Mr. William Howell, owner of Howell Electric Company, 707 Wilber <br />Street, asked the Board to delay awarding the contract to <br />Ziolkowski Construction Company until a matter concerning <br />minority hiring was cleared up. He stated that he felt dis- <br />criminatory practices have been used in the past by the contractor. <br />Mr. Hill stated that he had discussed Mr. Howell's complaint with <br />Mr. Leszczynski and Mr. Kernan. He stated that state law provides <br />that certain certifications be made regarding employment practices <br />of any contractor submitting a bid. He advised that the Board is <br />required to make certain those certifications are made, and, if <br />there is information that would indicate the contractor is using <br />discriminatory practices, the Board needed to be aware of it. <br />Mr. Hill stated that Mr. Howell's complaint concerned a <br />particular instance involving a bid submitted to the School <br />Corporation. Mrs. Pfotenhauer advised Mr. Howell that Ziolkowski <br />Construction and all other contractors must conform with the <br />requirements for submitting a bid and failure to do so would <br />result in cancellation of the contract. She referred to Indiana <br />Statutes, Title 5-16-6-1, concerning the requirements for equal <br />employment opportunity. Mr. Hill stated that the Board was <br />concerned about the employment practices of any contractor which <br />is awarded a bid or contract. He stated that a certification was <br />on file from Ziolkowski Construction affirming that he was follow- <br />ing all applicable laws. Mr. Howell stated that he was issuing a <br />formal complaint that Ziolkowski was discriminating and he should <br />not be awarded any contract to do work for the city. Mr. Hill <br />explained to Mr. Howell that the Board was satisfied that all <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.