Laserfiche WebLink
120 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 9, 1981 <br />questioned the effect the vacation would have on her property. It <br />was determined Mrs. Berndt would not be directly affected by the <br />vacation since her property was located on the other side of <br />Lincolnway. This was also found true of another property owner <br />who owned property on the east side of Lincolnway. Upon a motion <br />made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Kernan and carried, the <br />public hearing was closed. Upon a further motion made by Mr. <br />Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, the Clerk was <br />instructed to forward a favorable recommendation for the vacation <br />of George Avenue and surrounding alleys to the Common Council, <br />subject to any and all utility easements. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - VACATION OF PORTION OF SUNNYMEDE AVENUE <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that, in order for the Board to submit a <br />recommendation to the Common Council concerning the petition filed <br />to vacate a portion of Sunnymede Avenue, a public hearing had been <br />scheduled at this time, thus giving the Board an opportunity to hear <br />any opposition to the proposed vacation. It was noted that notices <br />had been sent to affected property owners advising them of the <br />public hearing. Mr. Stephen Drendall, 3503 Sunnymede Avenue, one <br />of the petitioners in the proposed vacation, addressed the Board. <br />He explained the boundary lines of the Plat of Fernwood, in <br />which the portion of Sunnymede was located. He stated that a <br />driveway presently exists which is being used as an alley on the <br />east of Sunnymede out to Jefferson Boulevard. He further stated <br />that the petition for vacation included only the first 114 feet <br />of Sunnymede running east from 35th Street, and further that <br />Sunnymede was bounded by Lots 6 and 7 on the north side and Lots <br />11 and 12 on the south. He stated that the lots were jointly <br />owned, and he explained the history and present uses of other <br />abutting properties. He advised that the Plat of Fernwood had <br />been prepared over 40 years ago and did not reflect what actually <br />has happened to the surrounding properties. He stated that all of <br />the parcels have access to streets, and a few lots remain which <br />are undeveloped and has thus been commonly owned. He stated that <br />Cole Associates had recently conveyed its property to the east to <br />Holy Cross Health Systems. Mr. Drendall then went on to explain <br />that the original plat had envisioned the development of 15 <br />residential lots in the area owned by Holy Cross Health Systems, <br />and that the character of the area has changed and the residential <br />lots were never realized. He felt that, if the vacation was <br />approved, Holy Cross Health Systems would be able to develop <br />its property in whichever way it desired and adequate access onto <br />Jefferson Boulevard would be provided. He stated that access to <br />Jefferson Boulevard would probably be more preferable since <br />Jefferson was already a commercial street and was wide enough <br />to handle the type of traffic which would be generated from the <br />facility, rather than coming out onto 35th Street. He did not <br />feel Sunnymede should exist because the plat uses had drastically <br />changed from what it had originally been envisioned to be. Mr. <br />Hill asked if Holy Cross Health Systems, as owner of affected <br />property, would be willing to sign the petition for the vacation. <br />Mr. Drendall stated that he had approached the organization <br />approximately six weeks ago; however, they had just recently <br />acquired the property and were not ready to determine what their <br />future needs would be. Mr. Leszczynski pointed out to Mr. Drendall <br />that the parcel of land owned by Holy Cross Health Systems could <br />be landlocked if they decided to develop their property according <br />to the original plat. Mr. Drendall did not believe residential <br />development of the area would occur. Mr. Leszczynski advised <br />that the Board would be agreeable to seeing the street vacated if <br />the Health Systems group had no objection to the vacation. He <br />further stated that the Health Systems organization may want to <br />develop its property at some future time according to the original <br />plat. If that occurred, the properties would be landlocked. He <br />informed Mr. Drendall that unfavorable comments for the vacation <br />of Sunnymede had been received by the Board from the Engineering <br />Department and the Area Plan Commission because some parcels of <br />land could be landlocked. Mr. Hill stated that the Board's <br />