Laserfiche WebLink
112 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 2, 1981 <br />property owners opposed the sewer, the sewer would not be constructed. <br />He stressed that the Board had no intention of proceeding if a <br />majority of the property owners objected. He explained that 13 <br />signatures appeared on the -remonstrance petition, excluding that <br />of Mr. Myers (Mrs. Arpasi's tenant), and 24 property owners were <br />affected. He stated that he would like to take some time to go <br />over the remonstrance and make a determination as to the per- <br />centage of those property owners objecting to the sewer. He <br />hoped that by mid -week, a determination would be known, and <br />the Board would be able to consider the matter again at its <br />meeting on November 9, 1981. Mr. John Voorde, Councilman at <br />Large, asked how the property owners should proceed on the matter. <br />He wondered if they should try and obtain more signatures for <br />and against the sewer. Mr. Hill stated that anyone who has,not <br />previously voiced his or her position on the sewer should do so. <br />He felt the determination may be very close since it appeared <br />just about half of the owners objected to the construction. <br />He asked that the property owners convey their comments to the <br />Board prior to November 9, 1981. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr. Leszczynski and <br />carried, action on the matter was continued to the November 9, <br />1981, regular meeting of the Board, in order to allow a computa- <br />tion of those owners in favor of the sewer and those opposed to <br />its construction. <br />APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 (FINAL) AND PROJECT COMPLETION <br />AFFIDAVIT - WASHINGTON STREET LIGHTING PROJECT (ARROW ELECTRIC) <br />Mr. Leszczynski advised that Arrow Electric had submitted for <br />Board approval Change Order No. 2 (Final) for an increase in its <br />contract on the Washington Street Lighting Project in the amount <br />of $148.00 for re -installation of a pole which had been damaged <br />as a result of a traffic accident. The Project Completion <br />Affidavit was also submitted showing a final cost of the project <br />of $28,803.46. Upon a motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded <br />by Mr. Hill and carried, the Change Order and Project Completion <br />Affidavit were approved, and the Maintenance Bond extending to <br />November 2, 1984, was filed. <br />APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (FINAL) AND PROJECT COMPLETION AFFIDAVIT - <br />HARTER HEIGHTS ALLEY PAVING PROJECT (McINTYRE & JONES) <br />Change Order No. 1 (final) was submitted by McIntyre & Jones on <br />the Harter Heights Alley Paving Project in the amount of an <br />increase of $239.22 to reflect final quantities to actual work <br />completed. The Project Completion Affidavit indicated a final <br />cost of the project of $7,900.02. Upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, the Change Order <br />and Project Completion Affidavit were approved, and the Maintenance <br />Bond extending to November 2, 1984, was filed. <br />APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - FIRST BANK CENTER <br />(SCHINDLER/HAUGHTON ELEVATOR) <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that Schindler/Naughton Elevator Corporation <br />was submitting Change Order No. 2 to its contract for elevator <br />work on the First Bank Center in the amount of an increase of <br />$15,889.00 for revision of elevator equipment layouts in order <br />to provide additional room for atrium exhaust fans and silencers. <br />Mr. Leszczynski advised that, including the above change order, <br />the cost of the Schindler/Haughton contract to date was.$51,570.00. <br />He stated that the above Change Order had been reviewed and found <br />to be in order by the Construction Manager, Architect and Patrick <br />McMahon. Mr. Leslie Doty, 3502 Lincolnway West, questioned why <br />the city was involved in approving change orders on the project. <br />Mr. Hill stated that the project was being funded with Urban <br />Development Action Grant funds, and Mr. Leszczynski stated that <br />11 <br />