My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/01/82 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
11/01/82 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 2:38:13 PM
Creation date
10/31/2016 11:20:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
11/1/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- z6 <br />REGULAR I'EETING <br />NOVEMBER 1, 1982 <br />the house move if all building regulations had been complied with <br />because its authority was limited on the style of home in a <br />particular neighborhood. He asked.that Southhold in the future <br />give more consideration to moving buildings to particular <br />locations so that they fit and adapt nicely in the neighborhoods <br />in which they are being moved. Mrs. Phillip Achton, owner of <br />the structure at 316-318 West Marion Street along with Mr. <br />Beutter, felt the drawing submitted by Southhold at the Board's <br />meeting on October 25, 1982, was not accurate and objected to <br />the small, flat roofed home being moved into the neighborhood. <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Hill and <br />carried, the public hearing was closed. <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that Mr. Beutter was correct in saying <br />that the Board must address only the issue of the actual house <br />move and whether or not any hazards would be created in the move <br />of the structure. He stated that all zoning and building codes <br />which were applicable had been complied with. Mr. Hill advised <br />that the Board must deal strictly with compliance of these laws <br />and any potential hazards to city streets and sewer lines as a <br />result of the move. He stated that the city had no jurisdiction <br />in determining whether the style of the home was compatible to <br />the existing neighborhood, and it had been determined no hazards <br />existed to city property as a result of the move. Mr. Leszczynski <br />stated that Southhold had a good reputation and he felt sure the <br />structure would be restored in a tasteful fashion and would not <br />detract from the neighborhood. Upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, the house move <br />was approved. <br />PUBLIC HEAPING - IMPROVEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 3517, 1982 <br />(SOUTH BEND AVENUE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT) <br />The public hearing on the construction of sanitary sewers on <br />South Bend Avenue and Charles Street north of Edison Road, <br />authorized under Improvement Resolution No. 3517, 1982, adopted <br />by the Board on October 18, 1982, was held at this time. The <br />Clerk tendered proofs of publication of notice in the South <br />Bend Tribune and the Tri-County News which were found to be <br />sufficient. Mr. Leszczynski noted that the preliminary assess- <br />ment roll listed a total cost of the improvement at $123,770.90 <br />with the city paying $61,885.46 and the balance being assessed <br />accordingly to affected property owners. Unless more than 50% <br />of the affected property owners objected to the construction <br />of the sewer, the Board would proceed to obtain bids for its <br />construction. <br />Mr. Stephen Farekas, 1947 East Charles Street, wondered if the <br />sewer project included all businesses and residential properties <br />abutting South Bend Avenue and Charles Street. He asked if the <br />assessment was based on frontage or estimated cubic usage. Mr. <br />Leszczynski stated that the assessment was projected on the <br />amount of frontage per property. Mr. Farekas felt the assessment <br />for his properties was rather high. Mr. Leszczynski advised <br />him that the assessment included a tap charge and was a maximum <br />amount that could be assessed. He stated that, if the bids for <br />the actual construction came in lower than the estimated cost <br />of the project, the assessments would be adjusted accordingly. <br />If the estimated cost of the project was too low and the bids <br />were higher than the estimate, no additional cost over the <br />current assessment would be charged and the city would have <br />to absorb any additional costs. Mr. Chauncey S. Gensichen, <br />17700 Darden Road, explained that his business establishment <br />on South Bend Avenue was already hooked up to the city sewer <br />via the Turtle Creek Apartments Complex. Mr.. Leszczynski <br />stated that, in the case where a property owner was already <br />serviced by a sewer system, they would not be required to pay <br />the assessment connected with this project. Mr. James Ieraci, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.