Laserfiche WebLink
435 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 26, 1984 <br />Mr. Hill advised Mr. Fedder that it is his opinion that the <br />operation would not need the transfer license to operate in the <br />manner described. To further clarify the point, Mr. Hill read <br />Section 4-51(a)(6) of the South Bend Municipal Code siting the <br />definition of a transfer station. Mr. Hill further advised Mr. <br />Fedder that he understands the concerns expressed but if the <br />Transfer Station license would be granted from the Board it would <br />give the applicant the right to have garbage and any other <br />materials brought in to the transfer station. It is the Board's <br />understanding that this is not the intent of this business. Mr. <br />Hill read Section 4-51(a)(2) of the South Bend Municipal Code <br />outlining the definition of a Recycling Operator in order to <br />assure Mr. Fedder that he does not need the Transfer Station <br />license for the type of business to be conducted. <br />Mr. Fedder asked that the Board remove from the license <br />application of Something of Value, Inc. the designation of <br />Transfer Station originally indicated on the application. <br />Therefore, upon a motion made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr. Vance <br />and carried, the application of Something of Value, Inc. was <br />amended to indicate that the application was for a Recycling <br />Operation only. <br />Mr. Leszczynski indicated that due to the list of ten (10) <br />Department of Code Enforcement violations and twelve (12) Fire <br />Department violations that need to be corrected before the <br />operation can begin, he is uneasy about recommending issuance of <br />a license at this time and it would be his preference to know <br />when the violations will be corrected. <br />Mr. Fedder stated that the business will begin operation <br />approximately twelve (12) months from now and all violations will <br />be corrected. He further stated that the applicant wishes the <br />license granted at this time so he can proceed with securing <br />contracts with a supplier and the Bendix Corporation. Without <br />the assurance of a license, the contracts cannot be executed. <br />Mr. Hill advised Mr. Fedder that the Board understands the intent <br />but also understands that the application must go through the <br />complete process in order to be considered for issuance. He <br />stated that the Board would only want to recommend the issuance <br />of the license subject to full compliance with the violations <br />indicated in the above referred to reports. The Common Council <br />would have some concern as to what type of timetable has been <br />developed to have those items taken care of. Mr. Collier <br />advised that no violations will be corrected until the summer of <br />1985. <br />Mr. Leszczynski recommended to the Board that the matter of the <br />license application be tabled in order for the applicant to meet <br />with the Department of Code Enforcement and the Fire Department <br />to develop a detailed schedule addressing the various code and <br />fire violations, said timetable to be presented to the Board and <br />the Common Council on December 3, 1984, so it will be known when <br />the violations can expect to be corrected. <br />Mr. Hill stated that the Board would be in a position at that <br />time of granting the license subject to the work being done in <br />accord with the definite timetable and any approval given would <br />be contingent on that timetable. <br />Councilwoman Beverly Crone was present and asked why a 1984 <br />license is being sought at this time instead of waiting until <br />1985, if the operation will not begin for at least twelve months. <br />In response, Mr. Fedder advised that the operation is still in <br />the planning stage and contracts with the supplier and with the <br />Bendix Corporation must be signed now in order to assure their <br />business when the operation is ready to begin. <br />