Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 <br />feel that when this church is built, the litter, noise and <br />cruising problem will increase because of young people being <br />attracted to an isolated parking lot. <br />Mr. Stephens additionally informed the Board that Lot Nos. 84 and <br />91 are covered by Deed restrictions which Portage Realty devised <br />and placed on these lots and used as an inducement to encourage <br />improvement and purchase of real estate in this subdivision. He <br />stated that the Deed restrictions indicate that the property can <br />only be used for private single family dwellings. While Mr. <br />Peddycord stated that Lot Nos. 84 and 91 will not be built upon, <br />the building of a parking lot violates Deed restrictions. In <br />conclusion, Mr. Stephens stated that the vacation of Chalet Court <br />is not in the best interests of the residents of Southeast <br />Estates. <br />Ms. Barnard advised Mr. Stephens that the issue of Deed <br />restrictions is not one the Board has authority to deal with but <br />one that the residents will need to pursue and follow-thru on <br />their own. <br />As a point of clarification, Mr. Leszczynski advised everyone <br />present that the role of Board of Public Works in this matter is <br />to advise the Common Council whether or not the City needs to <br />retain and maintain Chalet Court for any reason or to vacate the <br />eighty (80) feet of right-of-way. The Board cannot base its <br />decision on any other concern. Those concerns must be dealt with <br />and decided by either the Common Council or the courts. The <br />issue before the Board today is whether or not the City need <br />retain, for any reason, the above referred to eighty (80) feet of <br />right-of-way, known as Chalet Court. <br />Mr. James L. Waldron, 1725 Provincial, South Bend, Indiana, <br />advised the Board that he is opposed to the proposed vacation. <br />He further advised that in the evenings, in the parking lot <br />behind the Michiana College of Commerce at Jackson and York <br />Roads, juveniles congregate to drink and create a nuisance to the <br />neighborhood. Attempts have been made by the Police Department <br />to remove the youths from the parking lot. For the safety of the <br />children in the neighborhood, the residents do not want to have <br />another parking lot in their neighborhood that juveniles might <br />frequent. <br />Mr. Larry Roller, 5563 Colonial, South Bend, Indiana, advised the <br />Board that Portage Realty represented to him that the area would <br />be for single family dwellings and they are no longer able to <br />keep that representation as a result of allowing the church to <br />build in the area. <br />Mr. Leonard Moretti, 5530 Colonial, South Bend, Indiana, stated <br />that there are Deed restrictions on the property. Also, the <br />proposed action impedes the development of future lots and sets a <br />precedent for unplatted lots in the area. He further stated that <br />there are no assurances by Portage Realty that Georgian Drive <br />will be completed. <br />Councilman John Voorde was present and advised that he is the <br />Chairman of the Common Council Zoning and Vacation Committee. He <br />stated that that Committee will be reviewing this request on <br />October 13, 1986, and welcomed any relevant information from any <br />of the residents regarding this matter. <br />There being no one else present wishing to speak either for or <br />against the proposed vacation, upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Leszczynski, seconded by Ms. Barnard and carried, the Public <br />Hearing on this matter was closed. <br />1 <br />n <br />