09-26-16 Utilities - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

because it is still aspirational at this stage to see the Federal Government want to start looking at other criteria. Committeemember Davis stated he is asking because if there is a process for public participation with our congresswoman and senators there could be a particular variable for the City of South Bend to advocate for which we know would help us. Mr. Fahey responded there would be some that would certainly give us a better outlook. Committeemember Davis stated it would be nice for the City to be proactive because we have mostly been reactive in this process over the years. He asked if the argument four (4) years from now will be that this project will cost even more than Phase Two (2) currently because we are now using 2016 dollars. Inflation should already be taken into account because it is frightening how much they have increased. Mr. Fahey stated once we come up with the final alternative that will all be considered including inflation. The issue was the figures we are now working with are almost a decade old. Committeemember Davis stated he is still concerned that our Administration signed off on a plan that did not have inflation factored in. Committeemember Randy Kelly thanked Mr. Fahey for his presentation and breaking down this involved project in a digestible manner. He asked what has been the success rate for other communities in renegotiating their agreements and how he saw South Bend faring in trying to renegotiate ours. Mr. Fahey responded if we come back with an adaptive plan which is the idea that we will do something for around five (5) to six (6) years and then reassess. If we also show we are heavily doing green infrastructure that will be more difficult than saying we are going to build three (3) miles of a deep tunnel. It seems the experience of other communities is that the EPA likes the concepts it is much easier to quantify to what the details of a tunnel will be because the specifics are much easier to quantify. Green infrastructure involves hundreds of pieces of small infrastructure across the City. It is very hard to quantify that. We are weighing all of this when looking at the three (3) alternatives. We are working with attorneys who have fought this in other communities as well. Eric Horvath, Public Works Director with offices on the 13th Floor of the County -City Building, stated what we are trying to do is create a compelling argument on the financial matters and trying to take it far enough that we can argue a level of control. What we have seen is that the communities that have gone and renegotiated to date have all kept that same level of control and worked hard to do either better in terms of the environment or quicker. We may get to the point when we start looking at this that financially we are not able to afford the level of control in our current consent decree. If we get there we are going to have a really compelling argument. That will take the Council being onboard with the Administration and the community all speaking as one (1) saying this is too big of a burden for us and we need the EPA to help us and consider alternate levels of control. There is only so much we can do if we stay at that four (4) overflows