My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-29-16
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
03-29-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 11:09:39 AM
Creation date
9/29/2016 11:55:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />MARCH 29, 2016 <br />In terms of helping the businesses affected by the ordinance there will be support available for <br />them including the extended implementation time to January 2nd 2017. Smoke Free St. Joe will <br />provide four (4) scheduled marketing seminars, the administration will help with permitting for <br />letting the bars invest in outdoor patios and the process will be as easy as possible, marketing <br />support from American Lung Association and Smoke Free St. Joe in terms of social media <br />promotion for any bars that might decide to go smoke free before the implementation date, as <br />well as help with signage and education regarding the ordinance. <br />One argument that has been heard is the case of the City of Elkhart and the possible negative <br />effect the smoking ban had in Elkhart. Councilmember Ferlic asked that the Council not rely on <br />any anecdotal evidence but instead rely on academic scientific research that looks into many <br />different factors. Elkhart's smoking ban was passed immediately before the Great Recession and <br />Elkhart had the third highest unemployment rate in the entire country during that time. If any sort <br />of businesses suffered during that time period it clearly was for multiple reasons. At the time the <br />ordinance was passed Elkhart was already seeing a decline in employment. Concerning the <br />rebound of employment in Elkhart, Leisure & Hospitality employment levels are higher than <br />they were when the ordinance was passed. <br />Councilmember Ferlic cautioned the Council against viewing anecdotal evidence and instead <br />look at the academic and peer reviewed studies. He provided the case of Plainfield IN which saw <br />their food and beverage tax revenue grow despite the recession and town's ban on smoking in <br />public places to show anyone can bring anecdotal evidence forward to tell the story they want. <br />Councilmember Ferlic addressed the questions brought forward during the Health and Public <br />Safety Committee. Regarding Elkhart it is important to note that correlation does not equal <br />causation. Ice cream used to be thought to cause polio because there was a spike in polio for kids <br />during the summer months. Now clearly polio is not caused by ice cream. This is an example of <br />correlation does not equal causation. <br />In South Bend during that time, even though the recession hit us less hard than Elkhart, bars and <br />restaurants did close. Those bars and restaurants closed even though we currently allow smoke at <br />those establishments. <br />Regarding the questions on home offices and the impact of this ordinance on them. If a home is <br />operating as a business and has employees and is open to the public then yes this ordinance <br />would apply. If it is someone simply sitting inside their own home, working on a computer, <br />running their own business this would not apply to them. <br />There were claims that research has been debunked on economics and invalidated. For every one <br />(1) study showing a potentially negative economic affect there are ten (10) studies saying the <br />opposite. The CDC study cites twenty -two (22) different articles that back the position that these <br />ordinances have no adverse effects economically. <br />Regarding the question on whether this ordinance will affect the casino, any casino organized by <br />the Pokagon Band would not be in the City of South Bend. It would be on sovereign land and the <br />decisions for that land would be made by the Tribal Council. Councilmember Ferlic stated he has <br />reached out to the tribal leaders many times and requested several meetings to encourage going <br />smoke free as there are many casinos in the U.S. who don't allow smoking. He encourages them <br />for the benefit of their workers and the people who enter their casino, if it is built, that it be <br />smoke free. <br />Councilmember Ferlic stated he received a checklist from Smoke Free St. Joe who reached out to <br />every bar and affected establishment. He stated he personally called every single bar and retail <br />establishment, he did not talk to some but he did leave a message when he could. It was a <br />Saturday from noon on until he called each one. He stated he had several meetings with bar <br />owners and always said he would be available to meet them. <br />Some people have asked about possible exemptions for retail tobacco and vape shops. This <br />ordinance is designed to promote public health to provide clean air to all public areas and all <br />employees in South Bend. Exemptions for certain businesses would not be a way to advance <br />public health. Yes some cities do exempt those establishments but some, like San Francisco, do <br />not. If we are looking for this ordinance to reduce as many cancers as possible, as many cases of <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.