My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Change Order No. 1 - Walsh & Kelly - Lafayette Falls Subdivision Pavement
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2016
>
Change Orders
>
Change Order No. 1 - Walsh & Kelly - Lafayette Falls Subdivision Pavement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:48:56 PM
Creation date
9/21/2016 2:24:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Projects
Document Date
9/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />DIVISION OF STREETS <br />TO: Linda M. Martin, Clerk <br />Board of Public Works <br />FROM: Nadia Correa, Engineer I <br />SUBJECT: Project 115-086 Change Order Summary <br />DATE: Sept 7, 2016 <br />The Lafayette Falls Subdivision Pavement project is the aftermath of a developer bankruptcy. Due <br />to this bankruptcy, residents of the City of South Bend were forced to live in a neighborhood with incomplete <br />infrastructure. After securing funds pursuant to the bankrupt developer's bond, the City bid this project and <br />eventually awarded to Walsh and Kelly. <br />The Lafayette Falls Subdivision Pavement project had expected cost overruns on HMA pavement <br />from the onset of the project. The construction manager, project manager, and contractor all met on site <br />prior to any commencement of work on the project. The consultant and construction manager verified on S <br />Morton Ct that certain depths of curb exposure were 2 Y4 inch, which was well over the estimated 1 '% inch <br />used to determine bid quantities. All parties agreed that quantities would overrun on HMA pavement as it <br />was necessary to meet city standards, however there was no pre -determined amount or estimate of the <br />overrun nor did the parties physically verify overruns on other stretches of roads. The contractor provided <br />the project manager with a schedule that set three consecutive week days July 26-28, 2016 for paving. On <br />July 26, 2016 the contractor supplied the project manager with the pavement tickets for the first portion of <br />the project. The project manager immediately entered these quantities into a spreadsheet for pay <br />application purposes; at this point, quantities were within scope and raised no red flags. On July 28, 2016 <br />the contractor supplied the project manager with the final pavement tickets of the project. The project <br />manager then input the remainder of the pavement quantities into a spreadsheet and determined that the <br />project had already ran over 35.05%. Due to the speedy nature of this project, this high overrun was <br />unforeseen to the project manager until after the pavement had been completed. <br />If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (574) 235-5796 or by email at <br />ncorrea@southbendin.gov. <br />Sincerely, <br />Nadia Correa <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.