My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/94 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1994
>
12/19/94 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:20:59 PM
Creation date
9/13/2016 11:19:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
12/19/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 19. 1994 <br />be required. This filter provides circuitry designed to equalize the frequency response of the receiver <br />co -located with the voter, to the frequency response of the remote receivers to ensure that the best <br />audio is selected for transmission. The specifications for audio response, wireline output, and <br />equalization are to ensure adequate audio levels and audio quality are provided to compensate for <br />telephone line losses and variations. <br />J&K: <br />Although the second lowest bid, not all of the equipment bid totally met all the published <br />specifications. There are specifications that were not met for the following bid items: <br />Repeater, both transmitter and receiver <br />Voting system <br />Satellite receivers <br />We requested full equipment specifications in order to compare published specifications of the bid <br />against the bid equipment. We have requested J&K to compare their equipment specifications <br />against the bid specifications and provide, line for line, confirmation of each specification. All <br />information received has been used for this discussion and evaluation. May it be noted that not all <br />equipment specifications requested were available. <br />The following items are of specific and serious concern: <br />The repeater bid is not programmable for the transmitter frequency. This specification is necessary <br />to ensure the availability and flexibility to exchange a high priority repeater with a lower priority <br />repeater in the case of a major failure with out changing repeater components. The specified power <br />output of the repeater with in -cabinet duplexer is necessary to meet licensed effective radiated powe <br />ensuring adequate rf penetration into buildings and structures. Unit bid would provide approximately <br />91% of specification. The specifications for spurious emissions and rejections, EIA selectivity, and <br />EIA desensitivity is to ensure the minimum amount of interference to and from the repeater and loss <br />of receiver sensitivity. <br />The specification for ferro-resonant power supply is to provide maximum possible built in protection <br />from power surges without loss of operations. The specifications for voter timing is to ensure the <br />fastest available activation of the voter to ensure any transmitted unit identification data is not <br />clipped and/or lost. The voting system that was bid is designed to accommodate up to four receivers <br />per voter card. This design allows for up to 32 receivers per system. Our system which has only 6 <br />receivers would use only two voter cards. <br />Hence, the loss of one of the two cards, that would make up our system, would be cause for the loss <br />of up to two-thirds of the receivers at once. The desirability of individual receiver cards is that with <br />the failure of a card, only one remote receiver is lost. The loss of multiple receivers simultaneously <br />in this public safety application could jeopardize police officer safety and is deemed unacceptable. <br />To ensure that proper voting occurs between the co -located and remote receivers, a voice frequency <br />filter may be required. This filter provides circuitry designed to equalize the frequency response of <br />the receiver co -located with the voter, to the frequency response of the remote receivers to ensure <br />that the best audio is selected for transmission. The specifications for audio response, wireline <br />output, and equalization are to ensure adequate audio levels and audio quality are provided to <br />compensate for telephone line losses and variations. <br />Emergency Radio Service Inc <br />Although the highest bid, all of the bid equipment met or exceeded the published specifications. <br />Specification information was forth coming as it was requested. Equipment submitted will be in <br />manufacture for some time to come as per communications between the manufacturer and us. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.