07-12-16 Utilities - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Committeemember Davis asked if there was any way to view the meetings live if you do not live in Indianapolis. Mr. Satterwhite stated if there was an interest and if somebody wanted to be more involved but couldn't get there I &M would be open to including more people. There is no pride of authorship with these programs, if we can make the numbers work and get the Commission's approval we want to know what those ideas are. Ultimately we can only do what the Commission will allow us to do but they all originate at that table which is completely open. We also have quarterly meetings to analyze the programs to see what is working and what is not working as expected. The Sierra Club took all mention of this process and its successes out of their resolution. Mr. Satterwhite stated out of four (4) of five (5) pricing scenarios, the lowest -price option is to continue operating both Rockport units. This includes adding the pollution controls on the plant and the long -term plans. There is a million different parameters on how these pricing scenarios work and the only one (1) where closing Rockport would be the cheapest would be assuming very high carbon taxes and really low PJM prices. Based on the Integrated Resource Plan, closing both Rockport units and going carbon free adds $9.40 a month for twenty (20) years to a typical electric bill. That number is based on the average usage which is approximately 1,000 kilowatt hours per month. Currently, I &M is planning on increasing hydro, wind, and solar energy by 12% by 2026 and increase energy efficiency by 6 %. This is based on our favored plan. I &M will have 14.7 MW of solar energy by the end of 2016 and by 2035 they are planning to add approximately 2,000 MW of wind and solar energy. Regarding the resolution in particular, Mr. Satterwhite stated I &M is supportive of renewable energy and a transition of their fleet. As can be seen in the IRP we are increasing renewables and have no problem doing so. In addition to renewables, natural gas fits in that equation as well as sort of a cleaner energy which is a non -coal option. Committee Chair Dr. Varner asked if I &M ever sees a scenario where they are 100% renewable in our lifetime. Mr. Satterwhite responded he doesn't know if scientifically that's possible at this point in time. If we were doing that, we would be relying on the PJM market to give us all of our power so that we can say we are renewable. The capacity factors don't as of yet fit where you can have renewable energy 24/7 on the grid. Renewables are very good things and we want to support and expand them and it is possible that with increased battery storage in the future we could do that but right now we have to always have power on the grid. There are actually penalties from PJM, which is the regional transmission organization which all utilities have to be a part of, if you don't have power on the grid. Committee Chair Dr. Varner asked if Mr. Robinson from I &M would like to add anything. Mark Robinson, 61470 Mayflower Drive South Bend IN, stated there are concerns with complete renewable energy on the grid. Mr. Robinson referenced an article related to Germany where that country is just backpedaling right now when they got to about 30 % -40% and it is starting to wreck the system. El