Laserfiche WebLink
Area Board of Zoning Appeals -September 2, 2009 <br />~~~lt ~1~_ o~-bo <br />STEPHEhi DRAGOVICH <br />The petition of Stephen Dragovich seeking a Special Exception to allow a group residence for up to five <br />(5) unrelated people in a "MFl" District, on properly located at 616 N: St. Peter Street, Portage <br />Township. Zoned "MF 1 ". <br />MR. KIMMEL PASSED OUT MAPS TO THE BOARD MEMBERS AT THIS TIME <br />MR. JEFF KIMMEL: 218 W: Washington Street, Suite 600, South Bend, Indiana. I'm an attorney and I am <br />speaking on behalf of Stephen Dragovich who's here with me today and he filed the petition himself. What <br />we're seeking here in this petition is for a Special Use variance that would allow Stephen to rent the home that <br />he owns at 616 N. St. Peter Street. Steve has lived in that house for eight years. This is a house that has been <br />in Steve's family for three generations. His grandparents lived there. His mother was raised there. His father <br />was a Notre Dame student many, many; years ago and rented part of the house where he met Steve's mother <br />and Steve purchased the property from his father about eight years ago. Steve's father has passed away and <br />this used to be a family neighborhood and it was zoned that way. But what I've passed out here is some maps <br />of the area and the one house that we have highlighted in the red there in the sea of yellow is Steve's house. <br />And the fact is, a general visual of what the neighborhood is like today. Steve lives there, doesn't rent to <br />anyone. Currently all the houses you see in yellow are being used as rental properties. The upper left hand <br />corner, the property just across South Bend Avenue, that was a group home that opened up just a couple of <br />years ago I believe owned by the Madison Center. To right and just to the south of that is a large apartment <br />building. Just south of that is a vacant lot directly across the street from 616 N. St. Peter. Below that is a <br />home but it is used for student rental. I don't know, the zoning may be single family, but it's grandfathered in <br />as a boarding house and it's owned by Kramer Properties and it's used for student rentals as is the house <br />directly south of that. The third house to the south across the street from Steve is also a rental property owned <br />by a different individual. Going over on the map on the same side of the street where Steve lives all the way <br />to the north, MF1, a large apartment. South of that a rental property. South of that next door to the north of <br />Steve, student rental. Below that for the next three houses, all student rentals. The house on the very south of <br />the street has been abandoned for several years and the house to the right of that is no longer standing, that's <br />been demolished and there is a large construction project under way and we don't know the exact nature of it <br />but it's certainly not for a single family use. Down along the south of Sorin Street those are just. the properties <br />that Steve marked that he knows for absolute certainty that are student rentals that we think there are probably <br />more of those as well. So I know this came out of or come to you with an unfavorable recommendation but I <br />don't think the staff realized what the demographics were here when they made that recommendation. And I <br />hope they would change that upon consideration of what we're dealing with here. I think the main reason for <br />the unfavorable recommendation up to this point goes back and it's sited here as a 2003 a Northeast <br />Neighborhood council or plan to revert this back to single family residences. That is idealistic but it's <br />unrealistic. These properties are being used as rentals and it's never coming back as single family. Steve's <br />been there for eight years and since he's been there two apartments have opened. There's a new construction <br />project coming up behind him for more multi family, multi use, multi resident purposes. A group home has <br />opened up. He doesn't enjoy living there anymore and for the Board to deny him the right to do what <br />everybody else around him is doing, would be to ensnare him and entrap him there and that would be grossly <br />unfair given the fact that he's not someone who's come in from out of town and looked for this property. This <br />38 <br />